The Evolution of Sean Hannity’s Defense

The Evolution of Sean Hannity’s Defense

"I am not Sean Hannity, I am.."

Rips off face, bleeds to death

At what point do the conservatives wake?

I mean, you have to be willfully stupid to not see that Fox is manipulating them

A man has no name.

Your argument is predicated on the fact that Hannity isn't lying to the public. At this point in the process - two years as you've said - the number of lies/alt-facts coming from this administration and Fox news far surpasses anything anyone else has done.

There's only one way to find out if Sean is telling the truth. WaterBoard. He said he'll do it. Might as well kill 2 birds with one stone.

You just can't make this shit up.

If this were a screenplay for a movie, The Producers would toss the script back to the writers for a rewrite.

This is beyond surreal and we've only just begun.

Lol do people actually believe this? Mueller's investivation is a big piece, but not even close the entirety of what this administration is up to. Big talk about "draining the swamp", but this is open season for crony capitalism.

The Mueller investigation uncovered evidence of bank fraud, wire fraud, et al that was so compelling that a judge signed a no-knock warrant for an attorney. Not just an attorney, but the attorney of the president of the US.

This type of warrant isn't done, and when it is there has to be overwhelming evidence that A) a crime was committed, and B) the attorney is inherently untrustworthy and so likely complicit in a crime that they would destroy evidence.

And we know whatever Russian evidence exists, it somehow lead the Mueller team to discover this information and hand it over to a third party for prosecution with the express permission of an individual hand-picked by Trump.

To quote a surprisingly poignant man, "If witch hunts required this much evidence, there would have been nobody burned at the stake."

"Michael Cohen has never represented me in any matter. I never retained him, received an invoice, or paid legal fees. I have occasionally had brief discussions with him about legal questions about which I wanted his input and perspective."

"I assumed those conversations were confidential, but to be absolutely clear they never involved any matter between me and a third-party."

Both from his twitter 7hrs ago.

So he states the conversations which he never had were not about a third party?

Just looking at the poor quality of his lies, I would say they do involve a third party and it's gonna be some juicy stuff.

So tomorrow Hannity might state he doesn't know any women and the child is not his?

So...Attorney-client privilege can’t exist if he’s not a client, correct?

Is Sean going down? Just heard about this and I'm so excited!

Nothing about this tweet is funny or accurate. Listen to him initially address it on his show. He says he never paid him, but he asked him questions under the pretense that it would be considered attorney client privilege. This is the most over blown nonsense I've seen yet and that is saying A LOT after the last two years of bullshit.