How can they still call it “alleged collusion?”
Fox "News" never covered the indictments/convictions/guilty pleas.
I run into this a lot with conservatives, they just don't even know how corrupt their leaders are.
... and they've only amped their propaganda game since then.
The uninformed are more informed than the Fox-informed.
This was the most interesting part of the article to me:
However, Henderson signaled that the developments might well impact the legal issues around Mueller’s authority. “We will most likely be asking for supplemental briefing,” she said.
Is this a case where Whitaker might move to limit Mueller's power, and the court would take that as a legal move, or is this a trap to be able to ask why Whitaker is moving to change the special counsel's mission?