Every post on my Facebook timeline since I joined, by month and year [OC]

Every post on my Facebook timeline since I joined, by month and year [OC]

No prizes for guessing which month my birthday is in.

I also wrote a blog about the other data I found on my Timeline, Friends, Events and other facebook data which you can read here.

All the data came from Facebook, and was analysed and visualised in Excel. Instructions on how to download your own data can be found here

Congrats, you wasted time by writing that comment.

I only came to the comments to say what month your birthday was. Now what am I supposed to do here.

It's a general trend I think that less stuff gets posted. I am quite active on Fb but don't really post anything anymore and a lot of my friends do the same. Photos and other small updates for example are today more posted on Instagram.

[OC] My First 30 days on Tinder

[OC] My First 30 days on Tinder

Don't worry, in another 11 months you'll have about 40 bots and maybe 5 more no response.

Source: am me

My issue is I get loads of matches, but I don't know if it's they're trying to be edgy or whatever (I'm lesbian), they usually drive the conversation and want to meet, but when you set an actual date they go, woah...

I should make graphs instead of writing.

Edit clarification - with girls... I don't even have men on as an option :)

Edit further clarification I live in an area that gets alot of tourists. So I'm guessing I'm getting loads of drunk girls swipes, then when they sober up they go like, oooohhhhh....

What kind of lesbian only dates women??

I realize this is for humor, but if you want to read about some math and feel bad, you can read this:

//It was determined that the bottom 80% of men (in terms of attractiveness) are competing for the bottom 22% of women and the top 78% of women are competing for the top 20% of men. //

[OC] I logged my sexual activity for the past year. Here are the results

[OC] I logged my sexual activity for the past year. Here are the results

Oh, that's gotta hurt. There were some years before I got married that I was worried I was going to be celebate an entire year, but luckily it never happened.

And now that I'm married, well I'm celibate all the time

I gotta hand it to ya, this probably took a lot of effort.

Not as much effort as you have probably spent handing it to yourself the last year though.

But, oh, the tax benefits!

Bull, I've paid in every year since i got married

Comparison between two quadruple pendulums with identical initial conditions versus two quadruple pendulums with slightly different initial conditions [OC]

Perfect illustration of why chaotic systems are impossible to predict - a miniscule difference in starting conditions and the states diverge dramatically in a short time.

Yes and this is why forecasting the specifics of weather more than a few days is not easy.

Differential equations derived using Lagrangian mechanics in MATLAB's Symbolic Math Toolbox and solved numerically using ode45. The lower segment of the blue pendulum on the right has an initial angle 0.001 radians (~0.057 degrees) greater than the same segment on the red pendulum.

Which is why people on MSNBC yelling at each other over stocks is merely entertainment at best.

Double pendulum motion [OC]

oooh This is going to be like one of those mildly satisfying posts where it's all nice and symmetrical. Yes, perfect loop ... Oh god. No. Not that way. Abort. ABORT. JESUS IT'S A MESS AAAAAA

Double pendulum is an example of chaotic behaviour - it has a very strong sensitivity to initial conditions - change them just slightly and its behaviour completely changes.

Tools used: python, numpy, matplotlib

Source: randomly created initial conditions

If you want to see more, you can follow my Twitter bot which posts gifs (every couple of hours) of pendulum motion released from random initial positions.

To all people asking for a source code - I still need to finish/add/improve some more stuff. I hope to release in on my Github profile in about one week time.

I want it to go for longer. 10 hours would be good

To me, there's a certain satisfying feature in all the asymmetry.

Am I doing this right? [oc]

Am I doing this right? [oc]
No, I'm pretty sure this is doing it right.


The best kind of correct

Technically correct.

I sold 7 Bitcoin last month, here is how I've used the money [OC]

I sold 7 Bitcoin last month, here is how I've used the money [OC]

This the same bitcoin that my friend was 'mining' on his computer 10 years ago?

I should check in and see how he's doing these days

Eh you probably would have sold long before it was worth this much anyway. Don't beat yourself up over it.

Yeah. I'm really regretting downloading everything but getting frustrated and going to bed and never actually going back to make it work.

Everyone forgets this.

My friends talked me out of buying coins when they were like 16c-36c each but other friends who did buy coins all sold when they hit $200 because you were crazy not to.

The lucky people are the ones who bought them and just forgot they had them.

Optimal routes from the geographic center of the U.S. to all counties [OC]

Optimal routes from the geographic center of the U.S. to all counties [OC]

Is it possible to generate one of these from any other point in the map as well?

A cool meta-post would be to repeat for every point on the map and only draw some kind of heat map for how often each point appears with each iteration.

As a Detroiter who has visited Toronto multiple times, I can assure you that driving through Toronto is still significantly faster than driving through Lake Erie.

It'd be cool see the optimal road map for getting to every major city, if we were to rebuild the entire US interstate system.

edit: For all those people who keep saying the same thing. I mean if we were to rebuild all the roads. OR, instead of rebuilding the roads, maybe it'd be more realistic to map the most efficient map for Elon's Hyperloop to reach all the major cities in US. Lets say any city that in the greater metropolitan area has over 500k people.

My Weight Loss in 2017 [OC]

My Weight Loss in 2017 [OC]

Congratulations, OP! Also look out - your x-intercept is in ~1.56 years. Don't want to go negative!

I was 19 when I finished basic training for the AF. I weighed exactly 181 lbs, and it was the best shape I had ever been in. You lost an entire Airman, in a year. That is truly amazing.


It’s hard to say how much weight I gained on the trip, especially when you consider what constitutes weight gain. It’s my belief that almost all of the weight I gained was due to water weight (between the car rides and all the restaurant meals). The fact that I went right back to the trend line in a matter of days leads me to believe that I didn’t truly gain or lose anything!

As for pictures, I’m still considering it. If enough people are curious for before/afters, I can provide.

If it were a linear process, then it would have an X intercept at that point. However, the rate of weight loss is proportional to the difference between calories consumed and calories burned, and calories burned is (more or less) a function of body mass.

dW/dt = (c-rW)

W = body weight

c = calories consumed per day (assuming constant and limited by the surgery)

r = constant having to do with metabolism and body composition. r must be positive because the more body mass you have to keep warm, the faster you burn calories.

We can see a couple of things from looking at this equation. One is that weight will be steady when dW/dt = 0 = c-rW, or when W = c/r. Since c/r is a positive divided by a positive, we see there is a positive value for W at which he will maintain his weight.

The other thing to notice is that this differential equation is autonomous, meaning the time variable t does not appear on the right hand side of the equation. Solutions to autonomous systems of differential equations cannot cross, so if he starts weighing more than c/r, he can never weigh less.

Of course, this model doesn't capture everything about a person's weight. He can reduce c by eating even less through will power, or even increase c over baseline by maximizing calories/volume of food by chugging olive oil or stretching what remains of his stomach. Also, r is not technically a constant. The Katch-McArdle formula supposes that r is proportional to lean body mass only, and even then it does not take into account exercise. Nevertheless, we do not need to worry about him wasting away to nothing due to an x-intercept.

Yes, I know you were joking. I just like math.

Try one of these subthreads