Conspiracy conspiracy

BREAKING: Saudi Prince AlWaleed Admits Under Interrogation That he Sent an Elite Team of Snipers From the Saudi Royal Air Force to the Mandalay Bay Hotel

BREAKING: Saudi Prince AlWaleed Admits Under Interrogation That he Sent an Elite Team of Snipers ...

Well I find it odd this random Twitter user knows this but I can't find anyone else reporting this.

Where in that article does it say what that Twitter user claims? Cause I don't see it.

Big if true

This is a bunch of BS, its sad to see people capitalize on current events

So browsing the 1st, 2nd and 3rd pages of conspiracy and they are mostly pedophilia and sex attacks by people in a high position. Since these things are matter of fact now, in reality, are there more psychopaths we rub shoulders daily than we care to admit? If so, born or designed?

So browsing the 1st, 2nd and 3rd pages of conspiracy and they are mostly pedophilia and sex attacks by people in a high position. Since these things are matter of fact now, in reality, are there more psychopaths we rub shoulders daily than we care to admit? If so, born or designed?

Definition of “psychopath” - English Dictionary

a person who is likely to commit violent criminal acts because of a mental illness that causes the person to lack any feelings of guilt

In a nutshell, they care zero about their fellow human beings.

All recent news, especially for the past year, revelations have come out, it is very obvious. Politicians, Hollywood stars, singers, actors, and royalty. There are also rape gangs plastered everywhere. If it wasn't for social media being viral we'll probably wouldn't know or care and would insist everything being classified nonsense and conspiracies.

There has always been psychopaths in society, since the beginning of mankind. But I am now questioning if there is a lot more out there. Quite an uncomfortable thought.

More likely, modern society created this mental illness so it is learned, possibly from chasing more money, more power, more privilege, more recognition. Are we all nuts? What can we do to heal? Can we actually heal, they heal? And how to prevent going forward?

In my opinion, I am guessing it all starts with learning empathy in schools.

And yes, I know there will be a few who are true born psychos like Ted Bundy, and have higher chances of committing violence on people without a care at all.

Please help me decipher this insane youtube carrier wave strangest computer events, just look, not a troll or whatever. this is BIG CRAZY IDK

Please help me decipher this insane youtube carrier wave strangest computer events, just look, no...

This is quite interesting and deserves more digging. Your theory and the presented evidence seems to make sense and I find myself agreeing with it after reading through the images/comments. This definitely deserves some more digging. I for one Will certainly be starting to do so myself now.

Cheers and thanks for sharing this and the theory.

I know how you all feel about new redditers, I can't help that, please look, I don't know what to do, it's either AI or humans using the platform to transmit other data,

thank you!! there is so much data in these videos, I can't even send a url.. thats weird. maybe I could bit.ly it..I will grab more screenshots and any other clues you think.

before you just think it's all chicken shit look at the search bar, that doesn't work ever. it went to a url with this only\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\c'mon you are the mighty genbest

Why does Q think George Soros is worth at least $1 trillion? Is George Soros the one who really controls North Korea?

Why does Q think George Soros is worth at least $1 trillion? Is George Soros the one who really controls North Korea?

The lists I've seen have his net worth between $8 billion to $25 billion.

Financier George Soros has established a pilot project to help support North Korea's first moves to a mixed economy. (1998)

https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/soros-woos-north-korea/106019.article

because Q is complete fiction

This is pretty interesting as well. Pointing to how George Soros types wrested control from struggling nations and profited off of currency exchange and arbitrage. Demonstrating how the IMF has taken advantage of global markets with the absence of regulated currency values, foreign exchange controls, and capital movement control.

Lyndon Larouche on George Soros - the IMF and big money

http://www.gwb.com.au/gwb/news/mai/soros.html

Well, this Soros, of course, is a pestilence, is very dangerous. He's a British-controlled entity, who is used by them, largely against the United States. He's on the non-wanted list, because of his association with promoting drug trafficking, by our drug czar's office, among others. He's closely tied to all kinds of filthy things around the world, and he is a marker of the kind of hedge fund insanity, which has triggered the Asia crisis. {That is, Prime Minister Mahathir of Malaysia in no way exaggerated, in no way mis-fired, in pinpointing George Soros as the key figure, or the typical key figure in what was done to Malaysia and other southeast Asian countries.} And those in the United States, who defended Soros, were being either ignorant, stupid, or just plain misguided, in some other sense...

He's not worth anywhere near a trillion. Putin is the wealthiest man in the world and even he doesn't come close.

Bot test and manipulation test (please read the text)

Bot test and manipulation test (please read the text)

UPVOTE

Because the downvote option is mass downvoted and won't appear for most people, here's the link: https://www.reddit.com/sub/conspiracy/comments/7dz21d/bot_test_and_manipulation_test_please_read_...

How do I know you aren't a bot trying to find out who is human?

This is really lacking in terms of statistical analysis.

A lot of people might vote on this as they browse the front page but not go into the comments.

You can be almost certain you'll have more people who Upvote/Upvote since the upvote comment will be at the top, and people who get distracted by the comment as they scroll down to the downvote.

I appreciate what you're doing and am interested in reading your final results, but the uncertainty in this is going to be extremely high.

Can mods do something about "content creators"? Accounts that make 80% or more posts versus comments, only comment a few times in the posts they create. I feel like this is the primary cause of the left/right divide. You're either one of us, that fights for your view everywhere.. or a..

Can mods do something about "content creators"? Accounts that make 80% or more posts versus comments, only comment a few times in the posts they create. I feel like this is the primary cause of the left/right divide. You're either one of us, that fights for your view everywhere.. or a..

Today I saw a post that was for the left, something just meant to create arguments, to divide us more.. this isn't the first time I've seen it for the left, but I see it often for the right.. the thing was, it was one account repeatedly making posts for their side only, with sparse comments trying to defend their posts. I'm not naming accounts to avoid doxxing.

The issue is, they create a lot of content that we all participate in, but they aren't actually participating in the rest of /sub/conspiracy, they're only interested in pushing, what seems obvious, to be their own agenda.

So what I'm proposing is a rule of some kind, that people need to show they participate in this sub.. that they comment on the things that we comment and participate in daily.

I feel this is a real problem that isn't limited to a side.. people the post far more than they comment, and they only comment to defend their posts. They aren't actually members here, they are literally, and obviously pushing an agenda.

I feel like most of these posts are simply made just to make us argue, to divide us further.. obvious political tools to keep us arguing amongst ourselves, to slide the sub.. they very obviously aren't "one of us." Or they would be in the comment section of everything, just like we are.

IMO duplicates are the issue. There should be one post per topic, or two max (one positive/for and one negative/against). As it stands the majority of posts are duplicate, and the structure of the sub (as a result of the rules and enforcement) is ideal for shilling. Want to "shape the narrative"? Just keep spamming posts until a couple of them stick, as long as you have enough domains and writers. Or hell, just make a few videos and put them on YouTube.

It's all just spam right now

I get what you're saying but I kinda disagree. If it's just a spammy, nonsense topic that is being reposted, sure, nuke it. But when it's a big topic with lots of interest and participation, I appreciate the reposts. When a post hits the front and gets more than fifty or so comments, it gets unmanageable and loses quality, IMO. I prefer the more obscure reposts that get less attention- I think that is where the best communication takes place.

No, I totally agree, I saw a post a few minutes ago, the #russiagate cartoon, where someone pointed out that that same post was made more than once in the last 20 minutes.. that's the issue though, posts that push a political agenda, and with enough of the same posts, they're going to reach the front page.

The main thing I'm talking about though, is people that only comment on their own posts, they don't participate or contribute to everything else.

I'm not trying to get banned for doxxing, but one example that is very popular is u/lightbringerflex. They mostly comment on posts they make, but they don't solely comment on their own posts. They may push an agenda, but they don't exclusively comment on only their own posts.

If I was going to push for a rule, it would be based on them. They participate in enough of the sub, that they aren't only pushing an agenda. But the people that only make posts, and only comment on their own posts.. that's an issue.

Hmm I get annoyed by it.

If they don't even respond to one comment in the thread, it makes me wonder what their intentions are.

The top posts of this sub are usually like that.

Don Henley Rumored to be Involved in Rape and Murder of 16 Year Old Girl in 1980

Don Henley Rumored to be Involved in Rape and Murder of 16 Year Old Girl in 1980

"I had a rough night and I hate the fucking Eagles man!"

-The Dude

Hotel California album cover contains Satanist Anton La Vey. Lyrics of the song describe how we entered and became trapped in this Matrix:

Last thing I remember, I was Running for the door, I had to find the passage back to the place I was before, 'Relax' said the night man, 'We are programmed to receive. You can check out any time you like, But you can never leave!'

Urg why is everything I love turning out to be evil lately.

The truth will set us free... this is seriously shitty though.

President Trump on Twitter: "Got to do something about these missing children grabbed by the perverts. Too many incidents -- fast trial, death penalty."

President Trump on Twitter: "Got to do something about these missing children grabbed by the perv...

Just so that it is clearly stated, this tweet is from 2012 and is NOT new.

why are you posting 5 year old tweets from a pathological liar?

6:13 AM - Oct 8, 2012

Thanks for the latest scoop.

They constantly got to paint Trump in a good light. It's about creating a culture around Trump so they can target and eliminate different opinions to control the narratives.

Edit: Welp they banned me.

Ryan Seacrest is the latest to be accused of misconduct.

Ryan Seacrest is the latest to be accused of misconduct.
Ryan Seacrest is the latest to be accused of misconduct.

I always thought he was gay.

Anyone who dumps julianne hough is either gay or stupid

Seacrest, out!

The claim comes from a former E! wardrobe stylist, who has come forward to allege that Seacrest behaved inappropriately toward her

I stopped reading as soon as I got to "her". Why? Because Seacrest is probably gay, but prefers to maintain a hetero media persona.

Therefore, this story is fake and has most likely been put together by Seacrest's handlers. Purpose is to generate a fake controversy that establishes Seacrest's "hetero" credentials in a backhanded way.

Alt possibility is that the stylist is looking for publicity and/or payday.

It's clear that US govt can fabricate child pornography charges against anyone anytime it wants to take someone down ... and NOBODY is talking about that

It's clear that US govt can fabricate child pornography charges against anyone anytime it wants to take someone down ... and NOBODY is talking about that

Good eye. I've realized this for awhile now. It takes nothing to plant child porn on someone's device, computer, or hard drive, and is a nearly indefensible strategy to take down anyone or ruin their life. Sexual assault allegations can be just as Machiavellian as well.

it's the same thing as when during Stalin's time, they accused you of being an "enemy of the people", an allegation thats impossible to disprove if govt presents proof, as there is nobody watching/controlling them - they are the ultimate authority.

literally anything can be fabricated, especially any online communication. if the govt says you wrote something in some online app or chat, and you didn't, there is no way you are going to prove you didn't. it's an insanely dangerous, sad situation.

Yes this is true. I remember a year or two ago the news said that thousands of computers in Homeland Security and other intel agencies were filled with CP. so either they’re all pedos or more probable the computer systems have been compromised to prevent agents from speaking the truth and blowing whistles.

One thing to note about MJ is that his personality traits, regardless of how outlandish they came of, were not the norm of convicted pedophiles. I remember watching a documentary about the psychology of Michael Jackson and several argued that he didn't fit most of nuisance characteristics of child rapists.

Try one of these subthreads