Can honestly say I’ve never heard that one. 10/10 for originality
For mobile and non-RES users | More info | -1 to Remove | Ignore Sub
Daaaaamn. That is a hell of a murder. He's also quite right. The fact that he does know what it is shows he paid attention to what his girlfriend was interested in.
All you young'un guys on Reddit, take note. Girls find it attractive when guys pay attention to what she is interested in. Also, MASSIVE bonus points if you are willing to make a run to the store for feminine products without complaint and maybe keeping an emergency stash in your car!
It really bothers me how she used "you're" and in the next immediate text reverted to "u".
And here I am, a female, not knowing what that was. Rip me.
It is laughable to assume Mr. Hannity is capable of conducting a fair and balanced interview.
Now THIS is a murdered by words!
This bit is gonna be great in the movie of this
I hope more advertisers pull support from Hannity. And Fox news in general.
"That's not happening. Not on my watch."
(She walks away, not even looking at the Michael Bay explosions).
Is there no /sub/wordplay or something? Nobody was even slightly harmed here come on
No users were harmed in the making of this post
300 upvotes? This sub has lost most of its meaning at this point
Both of these people seem insufferable.
I'm gonna go ahead and side with neither of these individuals. They're both pretty repulsive.
Tyler Durden sure is mean
The projection is a bit much but ok lol
This is the third fucking time this has been posted today and it is literally the post before this one on this sub.
It’s been posted thrice in five hours, and two of those were in the last two hours. I’m not sure what your picture is trying to say.
It was posted then deleted when I called out OP. This was his response.
Power to the player!
I'm still not sure what the point of the AMA was. If anyone went in there expecting anything other than vague PR non-answers and non-committal promises of change in the future, they haven't been around here very long.
Having to spend $2100 to unlock a games content is equated to having a temper tantrum? That's more than 11 years worth of MMORPG subscriptions. That's like 10 years of card game packs. That's like....Over thirty other new titles. I could buy 30 new titles, BRAND NEW GAMES. Or, I could unlock the content in ONE GAME. It's insanity.
Bah gawd, I think he's dead!
I remember paying $60-$80 for a game and not having a billion damn microtransactions. Ahh the good 'ol days lmao
Pouring one out now.
Kangaroos and 4 feet long spiders don't care about human feelings.
I'm Aussie and I hear it all the time. Guess my mates are less discreet.
It'd be nice if the Pentagon actually updated when people are discharged for that so they can't get a gun. You can't expect the law to work when it's not enforced.
Edit: some comments seem to not understand the context. The Tweet is stating that people who cause domestic violence shouldn't own a gun because the Texas shooter was discharged because of domestic violence. The Pentagon never updated his information labeling him as a person who committed domestic violence so he was able to purchase a firearm even though a law was in place to stop it already.
This is what happens when you don't take the time to look things up before opening your mouth.
It's even worse when it's a spouse who is abusing the kids. A have a friend who divorced his wife for hitting their son. The Air Force CRB found her guilty but didn't update the national registry (just like this guy)
The kicker here is that because the civilian divorce court didn't "understand" military matters they gave her custody of the kids.
How about instead of limiting it to men hitting women and children...we say anyone hitting their spouse or children.
Edit: I'm talking bout the first tweet.
Edit2: okay god damn I didn't expect to open a Can of worms this big... just to be clear IM TALKING ABOUT WHAT DAVID SAID IN THE TWEET. also, just putting this out there, women can be violent against their spouse to the point of murder too.