In wake of AVFM being named a "hate site" by the SPLC, Cassie Jaye has contacted them to ask if Jezebel & other feminist sites like Jessica Valenti's Feministing will be added for their articles endorsing violence/hatred against men
The Southern Poverty Law Center today announced they were "adding male supremacy organizations to our hate group list": http://archive.is/CNusU
Their entry includes (false) discussion of Gamergate which is discussed in this KiA thread: https://www.reddit.com/sub/KotakuInAction/comments/7zbtdg/southern_poverty_law_center_labels_a_vo...
For years feminists have declared that A Voice for Men (AVFM) & MRAs were listed as "hate groups" by the SPLC, back then the SPLC specifically said they weren't- Cassie spoke with them where they confirmed that in her Red Pill documentary. Cassie wrote this on her Facebook, you can find her as "CassieJayeOfficial":
Today the Southern Poverty Law Center announced that they are officially adding the men's rights website A Voice for Men to their list of 'Hate Groups'.
This is surprising to me since I interviewed the SPLC's Senior Fellow (Mark Potok) in January 2016 while I was editing The Red Pill and he clarified that the men's rights movement, and the various websites including A Voice For Men, were not listed as hate groups because they didn't fit their definition of a 'group'. He said the movement consisted mostly of websites and forums without an official policy, which is why the SPLC had not classified them as a 'hate group'.
Now, 2 years later, I'm assuming the SPLC has changed their definition of what a 'group' is. If this means any website that writes subjectively reprehensible commentary can be deemed a 'hate group', then why is Jezebel overlooked for their articles endorsing violence against men?
I wrote to the SPLC today asking for clarity on this matter. I'll let you know if they respond.
Cassie screenshotted the email she sent them, you can find it on her Twitter: https://twitter.com/Cassie_Jaye/status/966483102338924544
Men's rights website A Voice For Men has now officially been listed a 'Hate Group' by the Southern Poverty Law Center. I have more questions than answers. Hopefully the SPLC will get back to me to clarify what has changed.
The SPLC is widely criticized for their very loose definition of "hate group", as religious groups that oppose gay marriage have been included. Prager U did a video about it:
I love Cassie, she is awesome!
This is surprising to me since I interviewed the SPLC's Senior Fellow (Mark Potok) in January 2016
Everything changed when the Trump nation attacked.
Seriously though, that's why this happened. GG and MRAs etc. are somehow an army of alt-right trolls who convinced Hilary to only go to Wisconsin twice and are secretly Russian agents or something. That's been the narrative and this is the SPLC throwing their full weight into it.
That she is. I loved her documentary and love the fact she's like a kind and gentle pitbull to hypocrites.
The Democratic party became a pack of unflinching fascists the moment they lost the last election. It's the weirdest transformation ever. You literally have so-called 'legitimate' news sources treating a bunch of overgrown freaks wearing genitals on their heads as if they were a legitimate protest movement.
I've said it before and I'll say it again: Ever notice that SJWs hide behind their "righteousness" to cover up their own dark pasts, their criminal behavior, or their own immorality.
Another quickie, courtesy of Mombot.
As the OP quote puts it:
Remember when that UN child rights group demanded Japan ban manga?
One of their chief advocates is now in jail for 5 counts of child rape.
The "chief advocate" in question being children's rights activist Peter Newell, who as Mombot also adds, authored the "United Nations Convention and Children's Rights in the United Kingdom".
Basically, this guy wrote the implementation handbook for the rules which form "the basis of all Unicef's work and principles" in the UK.
Suffice to say, hypocrisy is one hell of a drug. On the other hand, the UN and globalists adding even more sleazy crap to their track record isn't as surprising as it'd otherwise be.
Or, in simpler terms, SJWs always project.
"Globalism", the concept of people working together as sovereign nations to assist one another, is not negative.
However, "GLOBALISM", the political movement extant today, is very, very negative. They seek the dissolution of all sovereign nations, and they seek to place unelected bureaucrats in charge of all nations. The UN is a perfect example of a globalist body who seeks to usurp power to make decisions from its member states. The EU is another example.
For example, Poland does NOT want refugees - but the EU is trying to punish them to force them to accept it.
Globalists are vampires, plain and simple, power hungry freaks
Kingdom Come: Deliverance just reached a peak of 96K concurrent players on Steam today. This is even more than The Witcher 3. I can think of no greater evidence that appeasing to SJW bullies to censor your opinion or visions for your game is pointless. They're not the ones buying video games.
Congrats to Daniel Vávra and his team at Warhorse for making a fantastic video game. The sales have been pretty amazing on Steam and it proves once and for all that gamers care about the quality of the video game itself, not politics or drama. I think it's hilarious to see the traditional games media falling over themselves once again when it comes to reviewing games. They're completely out of touch with what gamers actually want to play and I imagine it must be really satisfying for Daniel to know that despite their best efforts, these shitty game journalists made no noticeable impact on the success of his game, leaving them scratching their heads, trying to figure out why nobody actually listens to them any more for purchasing advice.
But to be fair, I remember CDPR saying that more people played Witcher 3 on GoG than on Steam.
Yup. Also, Sarkeesian and Quinn's relevance is completely gone in 2018 lol. No one gives a shit. Those two, plus Wu, are the fucking assholes that started a lot of the SJW shit in gaming. I think since Twitter started banning people for dumb shit that it's kinda had a counteractive effect of no one giving a shit about people like her anymore. By trying to damage Twitter, these people have only damaged themselves.
I for one own The Witcher 3 on GoG.
No kangz in the game about 15th century Bohemia.
J.J. Abrams: ‘Star Wars’ Fans Who Didn’t Like ‘Last Jedi’ Are ‘Threatened’ By Women
I guess all the little girls who only wanted Star Wars toys when they were marked down to a dollar were sexist (Hasbro losing money). Also the whole country of China is sexist.
I think this short video sums up why I didn't like The Last Jedi. Women had nothing to do with it.
Kathleen Kennedy has publicly stated that girls couldn't identify with Luke Skywalker, so it was of course problematic and needed changed. So are all women inherently sexist to? By her own logic men who can't identify with Rey can't be sexist. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Eg87CszLGs
Whatever. Had enough of Disney and everyone involved with Disney Star Wars.
That’s it. Keep talking down to your customers. I’m sure it will work out well.
As a Stat Wars fan I feel threatened by a particular woman. Kathleen Kennedy. She seems to be dedicated to destroying the entire franchise.
"Am I so out of touch?
No, it's the fans who are wrong."
Yet JJ accepted the director's chair again, instead of turning it down in favor of a woman.
There was a time when games writing was done by people who loved games, rather than hard-line ideologues who are political writing rejects.
It's all based on the pretentious notion that games and gamers need to "grow up". Entertainment for the sake of entertainment is masturbatory at best, it all has to be 'art', it all has to have a message that makes it's audience think, and most importantly it has to be a tool to influence society to make the world a better place. Everything is political, and if it's not promoting the right kind of politics, it's part of the problem.
This is the attitude that's trending right now among the cliquey elite. Whether those propagating this are true believers or just opportunists looking to advance their own social standing (and bank accounts) is a mystery. I suppose we'll find this out when this fad peters out and those who are still around change their tune. But as it stands, the majority of the audience isn't buying into it. be it though apathy or resistance, which is why we're seeing so much hostility from the clique. Their virtue signaling isn't being met with universal praise, so they have to use their position to teach us lowly simpletons a lesson.
1.) Go to college 2.) Study journalism because its hip and stuff and allows you to preach your ideology 3.) No jobs because the market is massively oversatured with people like you 4.) Grudgingly take job to write about games, still want to preach your ideology anyway 5. Pretend you're a proper journalist, hate your job, the audience, and the topic you are supposed to write about and write about your ideology and beliefs anyway.
Couldn't have said it better. Been playing games since the 90s, and i honestly don't get what the end goal of this is. No one is buying into it, sjws that infiltrate games or other forms of gaming are absolutely hated and have tanked sales or backlash from actual normal gamers, so none of this is a success. So what's the point? These people and their agenda are like you said, resisted or ignored. Everyone sees them as assholes.
Let's be clear: they are not recommending the student be paid this.
They are recommending the student's lawyers be paid this for representing him in this ordeal. This is an award of fees, and I'm doubting the kid ponied up nearly $1mm for legal representation, so there was probably a lot of work that lawyers never expected to collect on here without an award of fees from the court.
JMU also followed its new protocol and policy, which included destroying Doe’s administrative file pertaining to his initial misconduct hearing and the subsequent appeal …This difference necessitated more extensive discovery for the Plaintiff here to determine what went into the original hearing and subsequent appeal, and the Defendants were never able to identify which documents were in Doe’s file at any specific point in time.
What the fuck.
Almost seems designed to sabotage any civil lawsuit.
mandatory double-jeopardy provision
Wait, what the fuck?
Don't worry, they'll just create another pointless class with high tuition so the SJWs can cover it.
I wish there was a way where we could show all feminists what the future of the world would look like 500 years in the future with their values implemented. I have a feeling it would be an Islamic dominated hellscape.
The man isn't dead. Zero out of REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
That's no man. He's actually an agekin and identifies as a 7 year old who is also attracted to 7 year olds.
The uproar over making fun of an accent reveals the absolute tunnel vission of these people.
When have people ever not made fun of accents? We make fun of british, scotish, irish, german, russian, japanese, southern US, northeastern US, Great Plains US, and West Coast US accents. Why wouldn't we make fun of Ugandan accents?
WAS THERE EVER A MEME MORE FORCED THAN THIS TERRIBLE, YET INFINITELY IRONIC, FORCED MEME?
Pepe was co-opted and weaponized by alt-right groups
How in the fuck are people still perpetuating this shit?
B-Because it's racism against Africans! /s
In other countries, people protest by removing their hijab. In America, feminists force hijabs on people
You'd think those brave feminists would be rallying their sisters-in-arms to fight the good fight in Iran and save the Persians...but no.
Here, IMC highlights and provides evidence of how a college student, Kathy Zhu, is being targeted for expulsion by the SocJus crowd for simply refusing to try a hijab on.
EDIT: Note as well that another factor behind the targeted attacks on Zhu is for her political views, being openly New Right/Nu-Right. Which to them is no different from Alt-Right, and thus Nazi.
EDIT 2: Someone else was able to screenshot the relevant tweets before they were removed and/or otherwise covered up.
Look, the hijab is empowering even if I have to force it on you over your dead body /s
One more for tonight. And if anything, it's a welcome reprieve compared to the shit that's recently happened. In response to Brianna Wu's attempts to virtue-signal and gamedrop over Bushnell's "defeat," IMC has this friendly reminder to give:
Wu sent herself harassing messages during #GamerGate because nobody cared about her or knew who she was.
The media fell for her lies, lent her a platform, and made her famous for it.
Behind the scenes, social justice warriors hated her, but she was useful to the narrative.
Wu: I'M THE WOMAN THAT...
hold up, I'm gonna stop you there... we're done here.
I'm curious to see what skin Wu is going to try to don when their run for Congress falls flat at the primaries.
Lynch is well-beloved, the incumbent and party favorite.
Wu's support lies almost entirely outside the district they're trying to win. If they weren't an utter egotist and Frank wasn't funding their lifestyle, I'd almost assume the whole thing was a scam.
I mean, it is a scam. But I don't think it is in Brianna's mind.
Someone inform Lady B that 99.999% of the rapists are coming from her own "safe space". Oh, and respect needs to be earned, you don't deserve it by default, Wu. And the amount of respect you've earned is just about enough to send a horde of Ugandan knuckles to spit on you because my own spit is far too valuable to waste on a trash like you.